ArticleScientific reports2025
3D printing of a low-cost videolaryngoscope for tracheal intubation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Videolaryngoscopes have been designed to improve the success rate of tracheal intubation on the first attempt; however, their high cost, especially in low- and middle-income countries, is a major disadvantage. Considering the clinical importance of this device, the Engineering School in partnership with the Anesthesiology Department developed a videolaryngoscope using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology at a more affordable cost. The methodology consisted of three stages: prospecting, modeling and prototyping, and realistic simulation on airway mannequins. The primary objective was to describe the creation and development process of the prototypes. The secondary objective was to determine the final production cost. This was an applied project utilizing an exploratory and descriptive approach. The study was developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, between May 2020 and June 2021, at the School of Engineering and in the realistic simulation room at the university hospital. Ten prototypes were produced before the final product, and they were subjected to strength and bending tests and evaluated on airway training mannequins to simulate the procedure conducted by anesthesiologists. As a result, we obtained a resistant, and low-cost device, named VLG3DUFF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.