Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646063›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The influence of individual differences in the processing of words expressing discrete emotions: data from a large-scale study.

Juan Haro, José Antonio Hinojosa, Pilar Ferré

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Effects of Individualized Arousal on Recognition Memory of Words.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan HaroDepartament de Psicologia and CRAMC, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Carretera de Valls, s.n, Tarragona, 43007, Spain. juan.haro@urv.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3456-4731
José Antonio HinojosaDepartamento de Psicología Experimental, Procesos Cognitivos y Logopedia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pilar FerréDepartament de Psicologia and CRAMC, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Carretera de Valls, s.n, Tarragona, 43007, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3192-0040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we addressed the influence of individual differences in personality traits measured trough a Big Five personality test, and sociodemographic variables such as age or gender, in the processing of words conveying discrete emotions. To this aim, we relied on data from a large-scale lexical decision task in Spanish. The analyses with linear mixed models revealed several interactions between emotional content and both personality traits and sociodemographic factors during word recognition. In this sense, there was a facilitation for fear-related words, mainly in male participants. Also, disgust interacted with agreeableness and conscientiousness, showing an inhibition for disgust-related words in participants scoring low in agreeableness or high in conscientiousness. Sadness-related words were processed more slowly in men, while this effect was absent in women. Finally, happiness-related words showed an interaction with openness to experience, age and gender. We discuss the complex interplay between the emotional connotation of words and individual differences. All in all, our findings emphasise the need to take individual characteristics into account when examining emotional word processing.

Indexed as

EmotionsIndividualityPersonalityAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultDiscrete emotionsEmotional word processingGender differencesIndividual differencesLexical decision taskWord recognition

Identifiers

PMID40646063
PMCPMC12254251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.