ArticleScientific reports2025
Evidence of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in livestock and wildlife in Northeastern Portugal.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Co-circulation of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus and spotted fever groupFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the death of an 83-year-old man from the district of Bragança, in north-eastern Portugal due to Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), a serological survey was conducted to investigate domestic and wild ruminants. The survey included samples from cattle(n = 94), sheep(n = 30), goats(n = 4), and red deer(n = 10) collected within the affected region and neighboring areas where the human case was reported. CCHF antibodies were detected by ELISA in the serum of sheep, cattle and red deer, corresponding to seropositivity rates of 3.33%, 38.29%, and 60%, respectively, indicating significant exposure to the virus. Indirect immunofluorescence assays further validated the ELISA results. Most of the positive cattle originate from farms located in the Guarda district, which are located close to the Spanish border. None of the goats was positive for CCHFV-antibodies and viral-RNA was not detected in any of the samples. CCHFV-RNA was also not detected in 15 ticks from Dermacentor and Rhipicephalus genera collected from vegetation or cattle, on one of the positive farms. Our findings suggest that CCHFV is actively circulating in northeastern Portugal. Reports of human cases of CCHF in Spain, particularly near the border with Portugal, are consistent with the detection of CCHFV-RNA in ticks feeding on domestic and wild animals in western Spain, highlighting the potential for cross-border transmission and suggesting an established circulation of CCHFV in the Iberian Peninsula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.