ArticleScientific reports2025
The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed.
- Content characteristics and information quality of flap transplantation surgery videos on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of cervical spondylotic myelopathy-related content on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Quality, content, and engagement of pulmonary tuberculosis related videos on Douyin: a cross-sectional study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Myocarditis-related videos on TikTok: a cross-sectional analysis of content quality and user engagement.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of osteoporosis-related health information on short-video platforms: a multi-source cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Quality and reliability of anxiety disorder-related short videos on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- The Quality and Reliability of Short Videos About Psoriatic Arthritis on Bilibili and TikTok: Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Article
- A cross sectional content analysis evaluates chemotherapy health information quality and reliability on TikTok and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Scroll, Learn, Replace: Evaluating TikTok's Role in Patient Education in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of pediatric inguinal hernia treatment information on TikTok and Bilibili.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Quality and content evaluation of male HPV infection on Bilibili and TikTok: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about choledocholithiasis on TikTok and Bilibili in China.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- A cross-sectional study on the quality of pediatric autism-related videos on short video platforms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Assessing the quality of general anesthesia-related short videos on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Quality, reliability, and content completeness of Chinese-language short videos on impacted wisdom teeth on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of vascular cognitive impairment-related information on Chinese social media platforms.Medicine · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about Sjögren syndrome on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension is a major global health risk, and social media platforms like TikTok play an increasing role in public health communication. This study evaluates the quality of hypertension-related videos on TikTok and examines the relationship between content quality and user engagement. A systematic keyword search identified hypertension-related videos published before February 25, 2025. After applying exclusion criteria, 139 videos were analyzed. Video quality was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) instrument. Engagement metrics (likes, comments, shares, and collections) were recorded, and Spearman's correlation and linear regression analyses explored associations between quality and engagement. These videos accumulated 7190634 likes, 3608023 collections, 247602 comments, and 3252697 shares. Most (85.6%, n = 119) were uploaded by health professionals. The most common JAMA score was 2 (74.8%), while the mean GQS score was 3, with 36.7% of videos receiving this rating. The mDISCERN score was most frequently 2 (71.2%). Video duration correlated with JAMA (β = 0.235, p < 0.05), mDISCERN (β = 0.190, p < 0.05), and GQS scores (β = 0.410, p < 0.001). Likes also correlated with JAMA (β = 0.661, p < 0.001), mDISCERN (β = 0.500, p < 0.05), and GQS scores (β = 0.815, p < 0.001). Comments negatively affected GQS scores (β = -0.574, p < 0.05). TikTok is a valuable platform for hypertension education, but content quality is moderate. Extending video duration, improving rigor, and enhancing review mechanisms may improve hypertension-related health communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.