Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646015›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Joint contact forces during barefoot, minimal and conventional shod running are highly individual.

Lena Kloock, Andrea Arensmann, Myriam Lauren de Graaf, Meike Gerlach, Kim Joris Boström, Heiko Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lena Kloock *Dept. of Movement Science, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany. lkloock@uni-muenster.de.
Andrea Arensmann *Dept. of Movement Science, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Myriam Lauren de GraafDept. of Movement Science, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Meike GerlachDept. of Movement Science, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Kim Joris BoströmDept. of Movement Science, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Heiko WagnerDept. of Movement Science, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The supposed benefits of barefoot running are an often debated topic, with many studies investigating footwear influences on the kinematics and kinetics of running. Few studies, however, have analysed the effect on joint contact forces (JCFs). In this study, we investigated the influence of different footwear on the JCFs of the hip, knee, and ankle during running using a 3D musculoskeletal model. Kinematics were recorded from 16 volunteers while running on a treadmill at two speeds (2.0 m/s and 2.5 m/s) either barefoot (BF), wearing minimal shoes (MM), or normal shoes (NS). Alongside the JCFs, stride parameters and joint angles were examined using a generalised linear mixed model. Results showed a decrease in the hip JCF from BF to MM to NS, no consistent changes in the knee and an increase from BF to MM to NS at the ankle. However, these changes mostly had small effect sizes, so it's unclear how relevant they are. The individual responses were much larger and showed opposite effects, indicating that the effects of footwear are highly individual and probably depend on the running style and characteristics of each runner.

Indexed as

Ankle JointHip JointKnee JointRunningShoesAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFootGaitHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40646015
PMCPMC12254368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.