ArticleScientific reports2025
The prevalence and causes of visual impairment in special schools and blind schools in Shanxi Province, China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness among students in special education schools (serving children with disabilities, including intellectual disabilities) and blind schools (for students with blindness or visual impairment) in Shanxi Province, China. A cross-sectional investigation was conducted across nine special education schools and two blind schools in Shanxi Province from March to September 2018. Participants underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, including visual acuity (VA) assessment using Lea Symbols or Cardiff Cards, refraction testing, and anterior/posterior segment evaluations. Non-cycloplegic refraction was performed initially, with cycloplegic refraction administered when VA was subnormal for age. Visual impairment was classified according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Demographic and general health data were also collected. The study included 441 children from special schools (mean age: 12.3 ± 3.5 years) and 56 children from blind schools or blind classes within special schools (mean age: 13.0 ± 3.2 years). Among special school students, 44 (10.0%) had visual impairment (mild: 9.1%; moderate: 0.9%), primarily attributable to uncorrected refractive errors (90.7%); 10 cases (2.3%) remained undetermined due to poor compliance. In blind schools/classes, 30 children (53.6%) were classified as blind, 22 (39.3%) as visually impaired (moderate: 28.6%; severe: 8.9%), and 4 (7.1%) as undetermined. Notably, 44.6% of visual impairment cases were avoidable, with nystagmus (25.0%), amblyopia (19.6%), and cataract (8.9%) identified as leading causes. These findings underscore the significant burden of uncorrected refractive errors in special schools and the high prevalence of nystagmus in blind schools. The substantial proportion of avoidable visual impairment highlights the critical need for early screening and targeted interventions to improve visual function for children with disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.