ArticleScientific reports2025
Long-distance target localization optimization algorithm based on single robot moving path planning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the problem of low positioning accuracy for long-distance static targets, we propose an optimized algorithm for long-distance target localization (LTLO) based on single-robot moving path planning. The algorithm divides the robot's movement area into hexagonal grids and introduces constraints on stopping position selection and non-redundant locations. Based on image parallelism, we propose a method for calculating the relative position of the target using sensing information from two positions. Additionally, an improved hierarchical density-Based spatial clustering of applications with noise (HDBSCAN) algorithm is developed to fuse the relative coordinates of multiple targets. Furthermore, we establish the corresponding constraints for long-distance target localization and construct a target localization optimization model based on single-robot path planning. To solve this model, we employ a double deep Q-network and propose a reward strategy based on coordinate fusion error. This approach solves the optimization model and obtains the optimal target positions and path trajectories, thereby improving the positioning accuracy for long-distance targets. Experimental results demonstrate that for static targets at distances ranging from 100 to 500 meters, LTLO outperforms traditional monocular visual localization (TMVL), monocular global geolocation (MGG) and long-range binocular vision target geolocation (LRBVTG) by obtaining an optimal path to identify target positions, maintaining a relative localization error within 4% and an absolute localization error within 6%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.