ArticleScientific reports2025
Amniotic and cervical fluids progranulin levels in pregnancies complicated by spontaneous preterm delivery with respect to intra-amniotic complications-a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The main aim of the study was to determine progranulin levels in amniotic and cervical fluid samples from pregnancies complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) or preterm labor with intact membranes (PTL), with concomitant microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and/or intra-amniotic inflammation. A total of 104 and 108 women with PPROM and PTL, respectively, were included. Paired amniotic and cervical fluid samples were obtained using transabdominal amniocentesis and Dacron polyester swabs, respectively. Progranulin levels were assessed with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Women with PPROM and PTL were divided into subgroups based on microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and/or intra-amniotic inflammation. Differences in progranulin levels among the PPROM and PTL subgroups were found in amniotic fluid: (a) PPROM: intra-amniotic infection: 51.8 pg/mL, sterile intra-amniotic inflammation: 52.8 pg/mL, colonization: 36.4 pg/mL, and negative amniotic fluid: 35.0 pg/mL; p < 0.0001; (b) PTL: intra-amniotic infection: 75.3 pg/mL, sterile intra-amniotic inflammation: 54.0 pg/mL, and negative amniotic fluid: 39.1 pg/mL; p < 0.0001. The corresponding differences were not found in cervical fluid: (a) PPROM: p = 0.14; (b) PTL: p = 0.53. In conclusion, amniotic fluid progranulin levels increased in PPROM and PTL cases with concomitant intra-amniotic inflammation, regardless of whether microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity was present or absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.