Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40645946›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2025

Achieving Quality and Effectiveness in Dementia Using Crisis Teams (AQUEDUCT): a randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of a best practice Resource Kit used by teams managing crisis in dementia.

M Orrell, L O'Raw, D M Coleston, M Opazo Breton, B Guo, T Dening, J Hoe, B Lloyd-Evans, E Moniz-Cook, F Poland and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

M OrrellInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. M.Orrell@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1169-3530
L O'RawInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5265-2885
D M ColestonInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
M Opazo BretonInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1226-7541
B GuoInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
T DeningInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3387-4241
J HoeGeller Institute of Ageing and Memory, University of West London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4647-8950
B Lloyd-EvansDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
E Moniz-CookFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
F PolandSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
M RedleySchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
A WordenInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
D ChallisInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6464-2286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with dementia frequently experience mental health crisis requiring psychiatric hospital admission. In the UK, Teams Managing Crisis in Dementia (TMCDs) vary in structure and practice due to the absence of a standardized model. A pragmatic, randomised controlled trial (RCT) was designed to evaluate the AQUEDUCT Best Practice Tool and online Resource Kit (RK). Twenty-three TMCDs across England were randomised 1:1 To receive the RK plus usual care (intervention) or usual care alone (control) ( www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN42855694 ). The primary outcome was the number of psychiatric hospital admissions for people with dementia at the primary endpoint of six months. Secondary outcomes included TMCD staff mental health (GHQ-12), psychological flexibility (WAAQ), and work engagement (UWES); and for people with dementia and carers, service satisfaction (CSQ-8) and mental wellbeing (GHQ-12). There was no significant difference in number of psychiatric admissions between groups (incident rate ratio: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.37-1.48; p = 0.397) and the primary endpoint was met. No significant differences were found for the secondary outcomes across staff or service user groups. Fidelity to the intervention varied; five TMCDs met or exceeded implementation criteria, while others reported structural barriers. Limited engagement was attributed to the absence of a learning collaborative and pandemic-related service pressures. Although the RK was valued by staff for guiding quality improvement, it did not significantly reduce hospital admissions or improve secondary outcomes. Future studies should prioritise implementation support and explore systemic barriers to service improvement in dementia crisis care.

Indexed as

Crisis InterventionDementiaPatient Care TeamAgedCaregiversEnglandFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, PsychiatricHumansMaleMental HealthMental Health ServicesMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID40645946
PMCPMC12254196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.