ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2025
Figure of merit for piezoelectric MEMS speakers.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Piezoelectric MEMS speakers, an emerging technology with great promise, face significant challenges in performance evaluation and rational design. Their broadband nature means that responses at every frequency point across the whole operating bandwidth contribute to performance, yet there is no widely recognized weighting approach for fair evaluation. This absence of quantitative criteria makes objective comparisons of different designs difficult, slowing the adoption of new design concepts; and it leads to ambiguous design goals without response balance across frequency bands. Additionally, the current design methods rely on labor-intensive simulations, further prolonging the development process. To address these challenges, two figures of merit (FOMs) obtained via theoretical deduction are proposed in this study. These FOMs facilitate the evaluation of key metrics, such as sound pressure level and energy efficiency over a wide frequency range, enabling quantitative comparisons among various speaker designs. On the basis of FOMs, the design process can be simplified into a single-objective optimization problem, significantly streamlining the speaker design. Using this method, piezoelectric MEMS speakers with ultra-high FOMs and superior performance are demonstrated. The normalized SPLs at 1 and 10 kHz reach an impressive 76.6 and 86.6 dB/mm²/V
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.