ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025
Technology adoption in healthcare: Delphi consensus for the early exploration and agile adoption of emerging healthcare technology conceptual framework.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A post-discharge homecare journey map for patients with colorectal cancer living with a permanent stoma: A qualitative study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- From Evaluation to Implementation: A Delphi Consensus Framework with Domain-Weighted Decision Models for Robotic Surgery Adoption.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Investigating the Potential Effects of Medical AI Systems on Physician Autonomy: Pretest of a Semistructured Qualitative Interview Guide.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn the ever-evolving landscape of healthcare, the integration of digital systems and medical devices is increasingly important for modernising healthcare delivery. However, the acceptance and adoption of emerging technologies by healthcare staff present challenges. The purpose of this research was to apply relevant knowledge to inform and improve a conceptual framework (ARC): early exploration and agile adoption of emerging healthcare technology. We report on an expert-led Delphi study to evaluate consensus regarding the framework.
methodThe ARC conceptual framework, presented as four successive phases: imagine, educate, validate and score, was evaluated by 23 experts over two rounds. Experts first agreed/disagreed with 31 enabling statements relating to the early exploration and evaluation of new technology. The expert panel made recommendations (n=20), which were incorporated into round 2 with a checklist to evaluate the potential of a new technology.
resultsAll participating experts completed round 1, and 13 completed round 2. Consensus (defined as >75% agreement) was achieved for 93.4% (n=57) of statements, with consensus without exception achieved for 34.4% (n=21) items and 16 new items added to the improved ARC framework, including on the appropriate use of simulation studies. DISCUSSION: The main findings highlight the importance of demonstration spaces, time in clinical environments with clinical teams, data-driven benefits and structured debriefs with staff.
conclusionA Delphi approach achieved expert consensus regarding the ARC framework for engaging with new technology and preparing the healthcare workforce for its use. Further advocacy is required to negotiate stakeholder involvement and interdisciplinary cooperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.