ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025
Prevention approaches aimed at men who commit violence against women: a scoping review.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo map primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention approaches applied to men who commit violence against women.
methodQualitative scoping review, according to JBI guidelines. The search was carried out from July to October 2022 in the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, BDENF, IndexPsi, SciELO and Google Scholar databases, without restrictions regarding geographic area, publication date, and/or language. All studies were assessed for reliability and credibility, according to the ConQual Score.
resultsTwenty-eight studies were selected, most of which had a secondary and tertiary level approach. Only two studies fell within primary prevention. The interventions were mostly carried out in groups. The interdisciplinary/interprofessional dynamic, rarely described, involved areas such as psychology, social assistance, and other fields of social sciences.
conclusionThe interventions, in general, followed the group approach, with the potential to be replicated in other services, including health services and for other audiences, as long as they have the theoretical and human support for this, expanding the actions to the primary level of prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.