Observational studyBlood advances2025
Outcomes and survival prediction in adults with sickle cell disease treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Observational study in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07351435 (The Caribbean Registry of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Caribbean Registry of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) From the University Hospital in Martinique
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined Red Cell Exchange and Plasma Exchange for Post-Arrest Refractory Cardiorespiratory Failure in Sickle Cell Disease Sparing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Journal of medical cases · 2026Article
- Article
- Understanding the Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygen Support in Patients With Sickle Cell Trait.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThe utility of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for adult patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) remains poorly understood. We aimed to characterize a cohort of adult individuals with SCD in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry who underwent venoarterial (VA) or venovenous (VV) ECMO treatment, assess clinical outcomes, and determine predictors of mortality. This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes such as bleeding and thrombotic events (BTEs) of adult patients in the ELSO registry with SCD-associated International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Post hoc multivariable logistic regression model was developed assessing predictors of mortality. Of 206 included patients, 126 and 80 received cannulation for VA ECMO or VV ECMO, respectively. Eighty-three patients (40.3%) were discharged alive; in-hospital survival was 25.5% and 61.1% for VA and VV ECMO, respectively (P < .001). BTEs were common during VA (45.6%) and VV (33.8%) ECMO support. There was significant increase in BTE incidence for nonsurvivors compared with survivors with VA ECMO (55.4% vs 26.5%; P < .001) and VV ECMO (58.1% vs 18.4%; P = .01). Male sex, increased age, pre-extracorporeal life support (ECLS) cardiac arrest, cannulation for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR), and elevated lactate were predictive of in-hospital mortality in the VA ECMO cohort. In conclusion, in adult patients with SCD, in-hospital survival was significantly lower with VA ECMO than VV ECMO. Male sex, increased age, eCPR support, elevated lactate, and pre-ECLS arrest were strongest indicators of VA ECMO mortality. Bleeding and thrombotic complications have an association with inpatient mortality for those treated with ECMO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.