ArticleBlood advances2025
Sequential BCMA CAR T-cell therapy in refractory multiple myeloma.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-ICANS neurologic toxicity after BCMA CAR-T therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 4630 patients with multiple myeloma.Blood advances · 2026Pooled it
- CAR-T-centered sequential therapy: current status, challenges, and future clinical perspectives.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Patient-Specific Determinants of Response to BCMA- and GPRC5D-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A QSP Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Early deep response to cilta-cel as 2nd CAR T-Cell therapy after CELMoD-based bridging for advanced multiple myeloma.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Navigating the Therapeutic Landscape of Multiple Myeloma: Immunotherapy, Microenvironment, and Resistance.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- CAR T-cells in multiple myeloma: the race to the start line.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Review
- Review
- RNA-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Multiple Myeloma: From Molecular Targets to Delivery and Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- How should we choose optimal salvage treatments following BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy?Immunotherapy · 2025Review
- Serial TIL infusions and PD-1 blockade drive long-term clonal persistence in prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractMultiple myeloma (MM) relapsing after B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell treatment remains a therapeutic challenge. Data on re-exposure to CAR T-cell therapy targeting the same antigen are scarce. We analyzed 10 heavily pretreated patients with RRMM at 3 medical centers treated with the commercially approved CAR T-cell therapy product idecabtagene vicleucel in a real-world setting. Upon relapse, all patients received ciltacabtagene autoleucel as a second CAR T-cell therapy infusion, with bridging treatments permitted between both therapies. Sequential therapy with BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy was safe, with no higher-grade immune-cell-associated side effects or new safety signals. We found robust CAR T-cell therapy expansion and high response rates (100% with at least very good partial response, with 60% achieving minimal residual disease negativity), with an estimated progression-free survival of 64.8% (95% confidence interval, 39%-100%) at 6 months after the second CAR T-cell treatment. Duration of response to first CAR T-cell therapy was predictive for durable responses to the second CAR T-cell therapy product. Loss of BCMA antigen occurred in only 1 of 3 patients relapsing after ciltacabtagene autoleucel. Two of three relapsing patients died within a year, and showed no further response to bispecific antibody treatment. To our knowledge, this study provides the first real-world evidence that sequential treatment with 2 different commercially approved BCMA CAR T-cell therapy products is both feasible and effective, particularly in patients with prolonged responses to initial BCMA CAR T-cell therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.