ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025
Soft Independent Modeling of Class Analogies for the Screening of New Psychoactive Substances through UPLC-HRMS/MS.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proliferation of NPS has become a global issue, due to their easy availability and ability to bypass drug screening tests. These substances are particularly concerning because of their unpredictable toxicological effects and the analytical challenge in identifying them. The present study combines advanced analytical strategies based on UPLC-HRMS with multivariate analysis to identify and classify unknown NPS. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) spectra of 159 analytical standards were acquired, retention times and MS data were preprocessed and organized in separate matrices to obtain a training set (including 75% of the analytes) and a test set (with the remaining 25%). Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed distinct clusters for different NPS classes, such as benzodiazepines, JWH, and PINACA, while others, like cathinones and fentanyl analogues, showed greater dispersion. Subsequently, soft independent modeling of class analogies (SIMCA) classification models were built. The models were validated, achieving optimal values, and correctly classifying analytes included in the test set, especially when considering the data obtained at lower collision energy. External validation was conducted using three real seized drug samples. This confirmed the models' ability to classify data not included in the training set, as reflected in the positive validation parameters achieved for each model. Although some misclassifications occurred due to the limited availability of standards for certain classes, the SIMCA models proved highly effective in identifying NPS, demonstrating their value as a reliable tool for supporting forensic investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.