Trial reportPloS one2025
The effects of skill-based health education-A randomised-controlled intervention in primary schools in rural Bangladesh.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methodology for measuring behavior change dictates the perceived effectiveness of school-based WASH interventions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- The effects of skill-based health education-A randomised-controlled intervention in primary schools in rural Bangladesh.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Promoting healthy practices among schools and children in rural bangladesh: a randomised controlled trial of skill-based health education.BMC public health · 2024Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper evaluates the impact of skill-based health education (SBHE) on children's hygiene practices and health in rural Bangladesh. Over one year, SBHE was delivered weekly to primary schools through a randomised-controlled trial (RCT) by locally recruited trained para-teachers. The SBHE and soap provision interventions, provided in a cross-cutting manner, were randomly assigned to 180 schools stratified by two school types. Data were collected at both the school and child levels, involving 40 students in grades 1-4 at baseline and expanding to 50 students in grades 1-5 at endline, ten students per grade. The study tracked the same pupils, supplemented by additional and replacement students, resulting in effective sample sizes of 7,192 at baseline and 8,992 at endline. The results indicate that SBHE significantly improved hygiene practices; the average treatment effects on overall hygiene practices was 0.22 SD [0.14-0.31] (p < 0.001), and those on health/hygiene knowledge was 0.44 SD [0.33-0.55] (p < 0.001). While improvements in cold-related symptoms among the SBHE school children were marginally significant (-0.05 SD [-0.10, -0.01], p = 0.09), the overall trends indicated general improvement in health as well as healthy behaviours across all schools, irrespective of treatment status. Additional analysis incorporating inter-school spillover effects provided robust evidence of beneficial healthy practice externalities, extending beyond treatment school children. A cross-cutting soap provision treatment, although implemented imperfectly, did not show any standalone positive health-related effects. Nonetheless, our cost-effectiveness analysis indicated the economic viability of SBHE, particularly when accounting for spillover effects. This study is registered in the AEA RCT registry (No.0004265) and the ISRCTN registry (No.18002856).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.