Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40644504›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Association between self-administrated prophylactics and SARS-CoV-2 infection among traditional market vendors from the Central Highlands of Peru: A nested case-control study.

Daniel A Andrade, Ana Ho-Palma, Cesar A Valdivia-Carrera, Astrid Munguia, Christine Leyns, Javier Guitian, Eloy Gonzales-Gustavson

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel A AndradeCenter of Global Health, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0679-7535
Ana Ho-PalmaDepartment of Human Medicine, School of Human Medicine, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Junin, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3228-4074
Cesar A Valdivia-CarreraDepartment of Animal and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
Astrid MunguiaTropical and Highlands Veterinary Research Institute, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Junin, Peru.
Christine LeynsResearch Institute of Social Sciences (INCISO), Faculty of Social Sciences, Universidad Mayor de San Simon, Cochabamba, Bolivia.
Javier GuitianVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0799-0476
Eloy Gonzales-GustavsonCenter of Global Health, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7328-2983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although COVID-19 is no longer a public health emergency of international concern, understanding behaviours such as self-medication remains relevant for informing future outbreak responses and improving public health preparedness. Despite its widespread use during the pandemic, research on medications preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthy individuals is scarce. We investigated the association between self-administered prophylactics and SARS-CoV-2 infection during the third wave of the pandemic in Peru. A nested case-control study was carried out in a cohort of traditional market vendors in the Peruvian Central Highlands, enrolled in a health program. Cases (positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis) were matched with controls (negative) by age, sex, and market of origin. Conditional logistic regression models were fitted to evaluate the association between self-administered prophylactics and SARS-CoV-2 infection. As a result, 73 cases were matched with 176 controls. Acetylsalicylic acid consumption increased SARS-CoV-2 infection odds (adjusted Odds Ratio 2.34; 95% Confidence Interval 1.17-4.66). Conversely, vitamin C consumption reduced infection odds (adjusted Odds Ratio 0.44; 95% Confidence Interval 0.23-0.87). Finally, not having the COVID-19 booster increased infection odds (adjusted Odds Ratio 3.38; 95% Confidence Interval 1.43-7.95). In conclusion, our findings suggest that acetylsalicylic acid consumption increased the odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection, whereas vitamin C consumption decreased the infection odds during the third epidemic wave in Peru. Further research on the use of these medications is needed to establish a robust causal relationship with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

AspirinCOVID-19AdultCase-Control StudiesCommerceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeruSARS-CoV-2Young AdultAspirin

Identifiers

PMID40644504
PMCPMC12250348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.