ArticlePloS one2025
Association between self-administrated prophylactics and SARS-CoV-2 infection among traditional market vendors from the Central Highlands of Peru: A nested case-control study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although COVID-19 is no longer a public health emergency of international concern, understanding behaviours such as self-medication remains relevant for informing future outbreak responses and improving public health preparedness. Despite its widespread use during the pandemic, research on medications preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthy individuals is scarce. We investigated the association between self-administered prophylactics and SARS-CoV-2 infection during the third wave of the pandemic in Peru. A nested case-control study was carried out in a cohort of traditional market vendors in the Peruvian Central Highlands, enrolled in a health program. Cases (positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis) were matched with controls (negative) by age, sex, and market of origin. Conditional logistic regression models were fitted to evaluate the association between self-administered prophylactics and SARS-CoV-2 infection. As a result, 73 cases were matched with 176 controls. Acetylsalicylic acid consumption increased SARS-CoV-2 infection odds (adjusted Odds Ratio 2.34; 95% Confidence Interval 1.17-4.66). Conversely, vitamin C consumption reduced infection odds (adjusted Odds Ratio 0.44; 95% Confidence Interval 0.23-0.87). Finally, not having the COVID-19 booster increased infection odds (adjusted Odds Ratio 3.38; 95% Confidence Interval 1.43-7.95). In conclusion, our findings suggest that acetylsalicylic acid consumption increased the odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection, whereas vitamin C consumption decreased the infection odds during the third epidemic wave in Peru. Further research on the use of these medications is needed to establish a robust causal relationship with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.