Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40644473›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Effects of chemical fertilization on bacterial community in rhizosphere soil of sugarcane.

Qian Wang, Shang-Tao Jiang, Juan Song, Yi-Hao Kang, Jin-Lian Zhang, Ting-Su Chen, Yang-Rui Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qian WangMicrobiology Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, China.
Shang-Tao JiangJiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, School of Wetlands, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China.
Juan SongMicrobiology Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, China.
Yi-Hao KangMicrobiology Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, China.
Jin-Lian ZhangMicrobiology Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, China.
Ting-Su ChenMicrobiology Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, China.
Yang-Rui LiKey Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement (Guangxi), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/ Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement/ Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7559-9244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most sugarcane growing areas in China have undergone over 30 years of continuous monocropping, and long-term chemical fertilizer application has led to severe soil degradation. In order to provide a theoretical basis for the sustainable development of sugarcane production and scientific and reasonable fertilization, the effects of different fertilization levels on agronomic traits and rhizosphere soil bacterial community in plant crop of sugarcane were investigated. Four fertilization levels were set in the experiment conducted in the field of Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences: no fertilization (0%); low fertilization level (25%); half-reduced fertilization level (50%); and full fertilization level (100%). Two sugarcane varieties GT29 and GT58 were used, and agronomic traits in sugarcane and soil physicochemical properties in the rhizosphere were measured. Illumina high-throughput sequencing technology was employed to analyze the bacterial community structure in soil. The results indicated that the cane yield showed the order of half-reduced fertilization level (50%) > full fertilization level (100%) > low fertilization level (25%) > no fertilization (0%) in both varieties, and that in GT58 showed significant differences in different treatments except for that between half-reduced fertilization level (50%) and full fertilization level (100%). The dominant bacterial phyla in the rhizosphere soil included Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Acidobacteria (> 10%). Variance partitioning analysis (VPA) results indicated that soil physicochemical properties had the most significant impact on the bacterial community, followed by chemical fertilization, and then sugarcane variety. Notably, NO3-, pH, organic matter (OM), available P, Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu and Zn contents in soil all had a significant impact on the bacterial community composition (P < 0.05). Differential species analysis revealed that, under high chemical fertilization, three bacterial genera, Chujaibacter, Sporolactobacillus, and Ammoniphilus, were significantly enriched. In contrast, under no fertilization treatment, the bacterial genera such as Flavisolibacter, Aquicella, Ramlibacter, Anaeromyxobacter, Candidatus Solibacter, Polycyclovorans, and Candidatus Koribacter were significantly enriched. Co-occurrence network analysis showed that the half-reduced fertilization level (50%) treatment increased both the number of nodes and connections in the co-occurrence network, promoting positive correlations among the bacterial species in the rhizosphere of sugarcane. In summary, under the conditions of this study, compared to the full fertilization treatment, reducing fertilization by half did not decrease cane yield and did not significantly alter the community diversity of rhizosphere soil bacteria. Therefore, it was recommended as a viable alternative for fertilization in sugarcane.

Indexed as

BacteriaFertilizersRhizosphereSaccharumSoil MicrobiologyChinaSoilFertilizersSoil

Identifiers

PMID40644473
PMCPMC12250518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.