ArticlePloS one2025
Priority setting for nutrition research in individuals with spinal cord injury: A protocol for Delphi study among health professionals.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designA protocol for Delphi Consensus Study.
objectivesTo identify a top ten list of priorities for future nutrition research in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).
settingThe International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) Nutrition Specialist Interest Group (SIG) priority setting partnership was established in 2024 to conduct this international Delphi study through online surveys and a hybrid meeting.
methodsThe study involves THREE key stages: topic generation, priority ranking, and consensus building. In phase 1, participants will generate potential research topics via an online survey. Phase 2 involves ranking the top 10 research priorities on a 9-point Likert scale. Phase 3 consists of a consensus meeting where stakeholders will engage in discussions and vote on the final priorities using interactive tools. For Phases 1 and 2, both ISCoS Nutrition SIG members and their professional contacts will be invited to participate, ensuring a diverse pool of expertise. Phase 3 will be limited to Nutrition SIG members to facilitate focused decision-making. Data will be collected through secure Qualtrics surveys and analysed using descriptive statistics in STATA or SPSS. The study adheres to the Conducting and Reporting of DElphi Studies (CREDES) recommendations and employs rigorous data management practices compliant with City St George's, University of London standards. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted (ref: ETH2425-0192, Health Services Research & Management Proportionate Review Committee, City St George's, University of London). The findings will be disseminated through ISCoS website, professional conferences and a peer-reviewed journal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.