ArticlePloS one2025
Masking noise reduces the anti-predator-like response to an acoustic stimulus: Application of Signal Detection Theory to fish behaviour.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In studies of animal cognition, the influence of background masking noise on responses to any particular stimulus are often overlooked. In fish, there is little understanding of their response to targeted acoustic stimuli in the presence of high intensity (Sound Pressure Levels) environmental masking noise commonly experienced in the wild. In a controlled laboratory study, Signal Detection Theory was used to investigate coarse (startles) and fine-scale (swimming speed, group cohesion and alignment) responses of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) to pulsed tonal signals (170 Hz) differing in their signal-to-noise ratio (low, intermediate, or high) above either background ambient, or masking noise (fixed intensity Gaussian white noise: 120-3000 Hz). In comparison to independent control groups, fish exhibited a startle response, reduced their average swimming speed, increased group cohesion, and became more aligned at the onset of tonal stimuli under ambient noise. Signal discriminability was reduced under the masking noise conditions, with coarse-scale behavioural responses largely absent, and fine-scale responses suppressed but positively related to signal-to-noise ratio. This study enhances understanding of the potential ecological consequences of anthropogenically generated noise on the behaviour of fish and may help in the development of more effective environmental impact mitigation technologies, such as behavioural guidance systems, that use sound to induce avoidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.