ArticlePloS one2025
Fusion of Personalized Federated Learning (PFL) with Differential Privacy (DP) Learning for Diagnosis of Arrhythmia Disease.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantum Angle-distance kernel for ECG classification and anomaly detection: a quantum-inspired framework for biomedical signal analysis.BioData mining · 2026Article
- DualMask: Federated optimization of privacy-utility-efficiency trilemma via orthogonal gradient perturbation and RL-optimized PSO.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a novel privacy-preserving architecture, a fusion of Federated Learning with Personalized Models and Differential Privacy (FLPMDP), for diagnosing arrhythmia from 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. The architecture supports collaborative training in decentralized healthcare institutions without exposing sensitive patient information. By employing gated recurrent units (GRUs) for temporal sequence modeling along with feature fusion techniques and local differential privacy enforcement, FLPMDP ensures robust classification performance with data confidentiality. The architecture is evaluated on four experimental setups and demonstrates significant performance gain over centralized and federated baseline models. An empirical experiment on a large ECG dataset of 10,646 recordings indicates that the FLPMDP approach achieves an average accuracy of 93.71%. The FLPMDP approach yields F1-scores of 0.98, 0.93, 0.88, and 0.89 for sinus bradycardia (SB), atrial fibrillation (AFIB), supraventricular tachycardia (GSVT), and sinus rhythm (SR), respectively. Additionally, FLPMDP recorded a specificity up to 0.98, with a Kappa score of 0.8971 and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient of 0.9042, indicating high diagnostic accuracy and model strength. Comparative analysis against state-of-the-art methods-such as CNN, ResNet, and attention-based RNNs-indicate that FLPMDP consistently outperforms current models in accuracy, sensitivity, and robustness when facing non-IID data conditions. In the context of this research, federated learning is highly pertinent to modern healthcare, enabling secure and collaborative model training across institutions while complying with data privacy. The proposed FLPMDP framework offers a scalable and privacy-compliant solution for real-time arrhythmia detection, marking a step forward in deploying trustworthy artificial intelligence for decentralized medical diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.