ArticlePloS one2025
AI-generated corpus learning and EFL learners' learning of grammatical structures, lexical bundles, and willingness to write.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research study examined the manner in which English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners' willingness towards writing, grammatical construction, and lexical bundle acquisition were affected by language of AI-generated corpora. Eighty EFL students from China's Baotou Teachers' College participated in a repeated-measures quasi-experimental study and were split into controlled and trial groups. During the span of the 14-sessions, the experimental cohort underwent education that utilized AI-driven corpora, whereas the controlled cohort was instructed through traditional textbooks. Data were collected using pre- and post-treatment assessments, including tests on lexical bundles and grammar, as well as a willingness to write scale. The findings revealed that the trial group's performance was substantially improved than the controlled cohort regarding all outcomes. Specifically, trial group demonstrated higher mean scores for lexical bundles, grammar, and willingness to communicate. Statistical analysis, including mixed ANOVA, confirmed the significant effects of time and group membership on language proficiency and willingness to communicate. These findings suggest that the intervention positively influenced learners' language skills and attitudes toward writing. The interaction effects of time and group membership further highlighted the nuanced relationship between instructional interventions and learner outcomes. The study underscores the importance of integrating AI-driven language corpora into language teaching to enhance vocabulary, grammar, and communication skills. Pedagogical implications include the need for dynamic and engaging learning environments, while curriculum developers should consider incorporating data-driven learning approaches. Further research might identify optimal designs for learning and investigate its long-term impacts associated with such interventions. Policies should support equitable access to technology-enhanced language learning resources, promoting more effective language education practices overall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.