Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40644380›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Short-horizon neonatal seizure prediction using EEG-based deep learning.

Jonathan Kim, Edilberto Amorim, Vikram R Rao, Hannah C Glass, Danilo Bernardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan KimDepartment of Neurology and Neurologic Sciences, Stanford University. Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Edilberto AmorimDepartment of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Vikram R RaoDepartment of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6389-2638
Hannah C GlassDepartment of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Danilo BernardoDepartment of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1077-2963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strategies to predict neonatal seizure risk have typically focused on long-term static predictions with prediction horizons spanning days during the acute postnatal period. Higher temporal resolution or short-horizon neonatal seizure prediction, on the time-frame of minutes, remains unexplored. Here, we investigated quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) based deep learning (DL) for short-horizon seizure prediction. We used two publicly available EEG seizure datasets with a total of 132 neonates containing a total of 281 hours of EEG data. We benchmarked current state-of-the-art time-series DL methods for seizure prediction, identifying convolutional LSTM (ConvLSTM) as having the strongest performance at preictal state classification. We assessed ConvLSTM performance in a seizure alarm system over varying short-range (1-7 minutes) seizure prediction horizons (SPH) and seizure occurrence periods (SOP) and identified optimal performance at SPH 3 min and SOP 7 min, with AUROC 0.8. At 80% sensitivity, false detection rate was 0.68 events/hour with time-in-warning of 0.36. Model calibration was moderate, with an expected calibration error of 0.106. These findings establish the feasibility of short-horizon neonatal seizure prediction and warrant the need for further validation.

Identifiers

PMID40644380
PMCPMC12250315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.