Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40644358›Full record

Observational studyClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2025

Long-Term Protection Against Invasive Meningococcal B Disease and Gonococcal Infection 5 Years After Implementation of Funded Childhood and Adolescent 4CMenB Vaccination Program in South Australia: An Observational Cohort and Case-Control Study.

Bing Wang, Lynne Giles, Prabha Andraweera, Mark McMillan, Rebecca Beazley, Sara Almond, Noel Lally, Charlotte Bell, Louise Flood, James Ward and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bing WangVaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lynne GilesRobinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9054-9088
Prabha AndraweeraVaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2434-8370
Mark McMillanVaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6490-7707
Rebecca BeazleyCommunicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Sara AlmondCommunicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Noel LallyCommunicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Charlotte BellCommunicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Louise FloodCommunicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6771-1657
James WardUQ Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Helen MarshallVaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA publicly funded 4CMenB program has been implemented in South Australia since 2018. We aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness (VE) and vaccine impact on invasive meningococcal B (MenB) disease and gonococcal infections 5 years after the program introduction.

methodsVaccine impact was assessed using a Poisson or negative binomial regression model, and VE was estimated using both cohort screening and case-control methods. VE against the subsequent gonococcal infection was measured using a Cox regression model.

resultsRelative reductions of 72.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.0%-88.0%) and 76.2% (41.6%-90.3%) in the incidence of MenB disease were observed in infants aged <1 year and adolescents aged 15-18 years, respectively. VE against MenB disease for the 3-dose schedule was 98.5% (95% CI, 81.9%-99.9%) in children and 92.3% (34.3%-99.1%) for the 2-dose vaccination in adolescents. VE for 2-dose vaccination against gonococcal infections in adolescents was 39.1% (95% CI, 31.3%-46.0%). Lower VE estimates were demonstrated in those >5 years compared to within 5 years since vaccination (-6.3% (95% CI, -44.5% to 21.8%) vs 41.8% (34.0%-48.7%). The VE against the subsequent gonococcal infection was 27.0% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.730 [95% CI, .540-.988]), comparing fully vaccinated with unvaccinated case patients.

conclusions4CMenB demonstrates high protection against MenB disease in children and adolescents at 5 years. Moderate protection against the first and subsequent gonococcal infections in adolescents was observed up to 5 years after vaccination, with waning evident after 5 years.

Indexed as

GonorrheaImmunization ProgramsMeningococcal InfectionsMeningococcal VaccinesNeisseria meningitidis, Serogroup BVaccine EfficacyAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMale4CMenB vaccineMeningococcal Vaccines4CMenBgonococcal and meningococcal infectionsMenB vaccinevaccine effectivenessvaccine impact

Identifiers

PMID40644358
PMCPMC12596398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.