ArticleHealth policy and planning2025
The effect of performance-based financing interventions on health worker motivation and job satisfaction: experimental evidence from six national pilots.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital payments of health workers within vaccination campaigns: a mixed-methods study in Chad.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Does dosage matter? Effects of results-based financing layered on top of less comprehensive direct facility financing in Tanzania.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A long-standing concern suggests that performance-based financing (PBF) may undermine the intrinsic motivation of health workers by heightening extrinsic motivation concerns via the novel introduction of financial incentives. However, the theoretical effect of PBF on worker motivation and job satisfaction is ambiguous as these programs may also improve working conditions, staff engagement, and other factors that determine health worker morale. We use data from six evaluations of national pilots to empirically assess the effect of PBF on worker motivation and job satisfaction. In these six pilots (in Cameroon, Kyrgyz Republic, Nigeria, Tajikistan, Zambia, and Zimbabwe), geographical units (or health facilities) were either randomized or quasi-experimentally assigned to receive PBF or the alternatives of direct facility financing (DFF), enhanced supervision (ES), or business-as-usual comparison arms. Baseline and endline health worker surveys were carried out in the context of these national pilots. The primary outcomes investigated here are health worker motivation and job satisfaction. Secondary outcomes include subconstructs of health worker motivation and job satisfaction extracted using exploratory factor analysis. For two countries out of six-Nigeria and Kyrgyz Republic-we find increases in overall worker motivation and null effects in the other four when contrasting PBF with the business-as-usual comparison. For five countries out of six (all but Cameroon), we find increases in job satisfaction. Further, PBF did not have any systematic motivating or demotivating effects when compared with the health system intervention alternatives of DFF and ES (each in a subset of countries), except in Nigeria where satisfaction in the PBF arm was lower when compared with DFF. All told, these results contain practically no evidence of an adverse effect of PBF on overall health worker motivation or job satisfaction and indeed suggest a beneficial impact in some country settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.