ArticleIEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]2025
Development of an Affordable Self-Stretching Passive Device for Treatment and Assessment of Spastic Wrist and Fingers Post-Stroke.
Article in IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke, a condition in which blood flow has been restricted to parts of the brain, has been known to cause spasticity, a condition in which the muscles abnormally tense up through an overactivation of the stretch reflex. One low-cost solution to this problem is the use of self-operated passive stretching devices that can be operated with minimal assistance. The goal of this project was to develop and evaluate a new self-stretching wrist and finger device using an iterative design cycle. The device was designed with the following two stretching mechanisms: a rotating dial and an inflatable grip. Three stages of the device prototypes were developed: early, late, and final. After each stage, a usability survey was conducted with a group of healthy controls to rate 0-10 in criteria of overall comfort, unexpected pain, upper arm muscle tension, and device security of the arm. After, design changes were made to address common feedback. In the end, we saw that prioritizing the reduction of pain, decrease of unnecessary upper arm muscle tension, and increase of device security of the arm proved to be valuable measures of increasing overall device comfort. In addition, electromyography (EMG) data was collected with a healthy control subject to verify that the device was able to properly initiate the wrist flexors and extensors through the flexion and extension movement, and that each muscle group was isolated properly to their respective movements through the device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.