ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
Medically tailored meals in lung cancer care: patient experiences from the NutriCare Clinical Trial.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Integration of food and nutrition into oncology care: Proceedings of the Food is Medicine in Oncology Care Symposium.Cancer · 2026Article
- Why patients stay in or leave a medically tailored meals program: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo understand the perceptions and experiences of participants in NutriCare, a randomized controlled trial of medically tailored meals and nutrition counseling using medical nutrition therapy informed by motivational interviewing for patients with lung cancer.
methodsDescriptive analysis of exit surveys and thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 21 intervention arm (NutriCare) trial participants.
resultsMost exit survey respondents reported overall satisfaction with the intervention, particularly with the nutrition counseling. In comparison, satisfaction with the medically tailored meals was more variable. Six main themes emerged from qualitative analysis: (1) convenience of medically tailored meals, (2) support navigating cancer and treatment impacts, (3) preference for fresher and more flavorful foods, (4) desire for increased food choice and meal flexibility, (5) dietitians' role in providing nutrition expertise and social support, and (6) enhanced motivation and knowledge promoting behavior change.
conclusionsOverall, participants valued the convenience of the NutriCare intervention, emphasizing the logistic ease of home-delivered meals and remote nutrition counseling during cancer treatment. Many participants felt the intervention supported their nutritional needs and overall well-being. Our findings underscore the perceived benefits of nutrition education and counseling in tandem with direct provision of food and point to a need for further research on tailoring FIM interventions for diverse patients with lung cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Food is Medicine interventions, like NutriCare, show promise in supporting the nutrition and well-being of vulnerable patients with lung cancer, with additional benefits when combined with personalized nutrition counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40643889What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.