ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Dental age estimation by comparing Demirjian's method and machine learning in Southeast Brazilian youth.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dental age estimation in forensic odontology: a systematic review comparing traditional methods and artificial intelligence approaches.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Does Lower Regression Error Mean Stronger Forensic Evidence? Machine Learning Regression Versus Demirjian and Willems Methods for Dental Age Estimation at 12- and 15-Year Legal Thresholds.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Third Molar Segmentation Performance Across Dental Developmental Stages and the 18-Year Age Threshold Using Deep Learning Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Pilot Study on AI-Driven Age Estimation and Sex Determination in Greek Individuals.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- AI-assisted age estimation from occlusal tooth wear using biofluorescence imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinically interpretable deep learning for pediatric dental age estimation with explainable AI.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Neural Network Technologies for Age Estimation in Children from Orthopantomograms (a Pilot Study).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2026Article
- Validation of the Dental Age app for automated dental age estimation using Demirjian's method.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the applicability of combining Demirjian's method with machine learning algorithms to estimate the chronological age of children and adolescents from southeastern Brazil, using dental development stages as predictive variables. A retrospective study was conducted using 610 digital panoramic radiographs of children and adolescents. Demirjian's method was applied to classify the permanent mandibular teeth into eight developmental stages. Eight machine learning models-Linear Regression, Gradient Boosting Regressor, K-Nearest Neighbors Regressor, Support Vector Regression, Multilayer Perceptron Regressor, Decision Tree Regressor, Random Forest Regressor, and AdaBoost Regressor-were trained and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. Model accuracy was compared to the traditional method using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and the Coefficient of Determination (R²). Paired Student's t-tests were used to compare actual chronological age with predicted age estimates, and bootstrapping with 1,000 iterations was performed to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI95%). Machine learning-based models achieved predictive errors of less than 1.5 years. The Gradient Boosting and Random Forest models demonstrated the highest performance, with an MAE of 0.75 (95% CI: [0.66-0.85]) and an RMSE of 0.92 (95% CI: [0.81-1.05]), representing a 44.03% reduction in MAE and a 43.56% reduction in RMSE compared to Demirjian's method (MAE = 1.34, RMSE = 1.63). Integrating machine learning with Demirjian's method improved the accuracy of dental age estimation, reducing errors and enhancing the reliability of the approach. The application of artificial intelligence reduces the mean absolute error of the dental age estimation method. This approach can optimize diagnoses and assist in both clinical and forensic settings, providing a more precise and adaptable tool for diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40643883What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.