Trial reportAIDS and behavior2025
Behaviourally-Informed Two-Way Text Messaging to Improve Return to HIV Care in South Africa: Evidence from a Randomised Controlled Trial.
Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One-way text messaging to re-engage people in HIV care has shown promise, but little is known about two-way messaging. We evaluated a behaviourally-informed two-way text messaging intervention to increase re-engagement in care following missed visits. We conducted an individual-level randomised controlled trial between February and March 2023 in Capricorn District, South Africa. Adults aged ≥ 18 years who had missed an ART visit by > 28 days were randomised to (1) a standard one-way text message, or (2) behaviourally-informed two-way text messages. The primary outcome was return to care within 45 days, analysed as (1) intention to treat, and (2) restricted to successful message delivery. 3,695 participants were randomised: 1,845 to the one-way message group and 1,850 to the two-way message group. 27.9% (515/1845) of participants sent a one-way message and 27.2% (503/1850) sent a two-way message returned for an ART visit within 45 days (proportion difference: -0.7%, p-value: 0.622). In an analysis restricted to participants whose text message was delivered, 28.3% (310/1094) in the one-way message group compared to 28.3% (304/1076) in the two-way message group returned to care (proportion difference: -0.09%, p-value: 0.966). 19.5% (210/1076) responded to the two-way message. The two most reported reasons for missed appointments were being out of town (41.0%) and still having medication (31.0%.). Behaviourally-informed two-way text messages did not improve return to care over one-way messages. However, they elicited reasons for disengagement. Additional research is needed on the mode, content and timing of two-way messages intended to increase return to care.Clinical Trial Number: PACTR202202748760768 & DOH-27-042022-6703. 28 February 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.