ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Changes in sequencing technology used for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.
Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Genomic stability of human pluripotent stem cells: advances in research and screening criteria.Stem cells translational medicine · 2026Review
- Diverging guidelines and consensus statements on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: indications and strategies reviewed.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The continued development of assisted reproductive technologies has aimed to improve pregnancy outcomes through screening methods for the identification of embryos with monogenic disorders, chromosomal aneuploidy or structural abnormalities. There is an increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities for patients with advanced maternal age, recurrent implantation failure and recurrent pregnancy loss. To address this, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy has evolved through several methods since the 1990s, when it first began through fluorescence in situ hybridisation. The limitations of these early methods were overcome with the progression in technology that enabled the screening of all 23 chromosome pairs. These methods included microarray methods and next-generation sequencing platforms. Currently, these are used for PGT-A; however, for IVF clinics to carry out PGT-A utilising these methods, samples are sent to external laboratories capable of carrying out these methods. More recently, nanopore sequencing has emerged, which may overcome these limitations and be carried out within IVF clinics to facilitate faster patient results. This review focuses on the evolution of PGT-A methods through next-generation sequencing and the current status of these methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.