Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40643794›Full record

ArticleJournal of nephrology2025

Development and validation of personalized risk prediction models for patients with IgA nephropathy: a nationwide multicenter cohort study.

Keita Hirano, Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue, Tomohisa Seki, Sho Komukai, Hirosuke Nakata, Takashi Yasuda, Yoshinari Yasuda, Keiichi Matsuzaki, Tetsuya Kawamura, Takashi Yokoo and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Keita HiranoHuman Health Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. hirano.keita.4r@kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3695-9056
Tatsuyoshi IkenoueHuman Health Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomohisa SekiDepartment of Healthcare Information Management, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Sho KomukaiDepartment of Biomedical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
Hirosuke NakataDepartment of Nephrology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takashi YasudaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kichijoji Asahi Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshinari YasudaDepartment of Nephrology, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Keiichi MatsuzakiDepartment of Public Health, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Tetsuya KawamuraDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi YokooDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoichi MaruyamaDepartment of Nephrology, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Hitoshi SuzukiDepartment of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke SuzukiDepartment of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shingo FukumaHuman Health Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective prediction of immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) progression is crucial for early intervention and management. We aimed to develop and validate distinct IgAN prediction models for clinical and research applications.

methodsWe analyzed data from the Japanese Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in IgAN (n = 1174) gathered over 10 years. The models were developed and tested using data from general physicians in primary care, specialists in tertiary care hospitals, and researchers at academic research institutes. Three tailored prediction models (Primary Care, Tertiary Care, and Research Institute Models) were created to address the unique needs of different clinical environments. The primary outcome was a composite renal event defined as a 1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine level or progression to kidney failure. The predictive performance was assessed using C-statistics.

resultsIn the derivation cohort, the primary care model included predictors such as estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m

conclusionsThe prediction models for primary and tertiary care settings provided effective tools for forecasting renal outcomes in IgAN patients and are competitive with more complex machine learning-based models used in research. These models can help guide clinical decisions in various healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Glomerulonephritis, IGAAdultCreatinineDisease ProgressionFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsCreatinineImmunoglobulin A nephropathyPrediction modelPrimary health careTertiary care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.