ArticleJournal of nephrology2025
Development and validation of personalized risk prediction models for patients with IgA nephropathy: a nationwide multicenter cohort study.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk prediction in IgA nephropathy: from conventional models to machine learning, deep learning, and precision nephrology.Renal failure · 2026Review
- IgA Nephropathy: Mechanisms, Risk Stratification, and Precision Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluation of objective nutritional indices as predictors of renal progression in IgA nephropathy patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective prediction of immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) progression is crucial for early intervention and management. We aimed to develop and validate distinct IgAN prediction models for clinical and research applications.
methodsWe analyzed data from the Japanese Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in IgAN (n = 1174) gathered over 10 years. The models were developed and tested using data from general physicians in primary care, specialists in tertiary care hospitals, and researchers at academic research institutes. Three tailored prediction models (Primary Care, Tertiary Care, and Research Institute Models) were created to address the unique needs of different clinical environments. The primary outcome was a composite renal event defined as a 1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine level or progression to kidney failure. The predictive performance was assessed using C-statistics.
resultsIn the derivation cohort, the primary care model included predictors such as estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m
conclusionsThe prediction models for primary and tertiary care settings provided effective tools for forecasting renal outcomes in IgAN patients and are competitive with more complex machine learning-based models used in research. These models can help guide clinical decisions in various healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40643794What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.