ArticleEJNMMI physics2025
Effect of data-driven motion correction for respiratory movement on lesion detectability in PET-CT: a phantom study.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhile data-driven motion correction (DDMC) techniques have proven to enhance the visibility of lesions affected by motion, their impact on overall detectability remains unclear. This study investigates whether DDMC improves lesion detectability in PET-CT using FDG-18F.
methodA moving platform simulated respiratory motion in a NEMA-IEC body phantom with varying amplitudes (0, 7, 10, 20, 30 mm) and target-to-background ratios (2, 5, 10.5). Scans were reconstructed with and without DDMC, and the spherical targets' maximal and mean recovery coefficient (RC) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured.
resultsDDMC results in higher RC values in the target spheres. CNR values increase for small, high-motion affected targets but decrease for larger spheres with smaller amplitudes. A sub-analysis shows that DDMC increases the contrast of the sphere along with a 36% increase in background noise.
conclusionWhile DDMC significantly enhances contrast (RC), its impact on detectability (CNR) is less profound due to increased background noise. CNR improves for small targets with high motion amplitude, potentially enhancing the detectability of low-uptake lesions. Given that the increased background noise may reduce detectability for targets unaffected by motion, we suggest that DDMC reconstructions are used best in addition to non-DDMC reconstructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.