ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
Ab initio prediction for product stereo-specificity in the CH
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ab Initio Chemical Kinetics for Self- and Cross-Reactions ofThe journal of physical chemistry. A · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextThe stereo-specific production of syn- and anti-CH
methodsAll calculations were performed using Gaussian 16 software. Geometry, frequency, and IRC analysis calculations were conducted at the B3LYP/Aug-cc-PVTZ level of theory. The potential energy surface of the system was computed at the CCSD(T)/Aug-cc-PVTZ//B3LYP/Aug-cc-PVTZ level. The rate constants for individual product channels in the reaction, including the direct production of IO + CH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.