ArticleArchives of toxicology2025
Polyclonal antibodies towards abrin and ricin-design and potential application for mass spectrometry-based analysis of human biosamples.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Specific Binding Agents for the Molecular Recognition of Biotoxins: Recent Advances and Applications in Forensic Toxicology.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The analysis of highly toxic proteins such as abrin and ricin is challenging but comprehensive analytical methods are essential for their unambiguous identification after ingestion. This study pursued three primary aims at detecting abrin and ricin in human biosamples while ensuring that laboratory staff remain protected from direct exposure to these toxic proteins. First, two polyclonal antibodies (pAB) against specific peptides of abrin-A and ricin should be produced. Thereby, antibody epitope mapping was performed, which proved that both pAB recognize specifically their target peptide. Second, an affinity column chromatography-based assay was developed, and finally, the generated pAB should be tested using two different approaches (A and B) for their application in mass spectrometry (MS)-based bioanalytical workflows. Approach A used blood and urine samples submitted to the author's laboratory after suspected ricin intake. Samples were prepared for nanoLC-MS analysis using affinity column chromatography, gel electrophoresis, and overnight trypsin digestion. Analysis resulted in the confirmation of ricin presence in both plasma and urine. Approach B included the enrichment of an abrin-A-peptide and ricin-peptide using affinity column chromatography directly followed by LC-Orbitrap MS with a detection limit of at least 5 ng/mL in plasma and validation according to international recommendations. Since approach B is much more time-efficient and can be applied throughout laboratories due to the less equipment required, this strategy deserves further focus, especially in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.