SynthesisWorld journal of urology2025
Current state of AI for shockwave lithotripsy: a systematic review from YAU and EAU endourology.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- CT-based radiomics for predicting stone-free rate after ESWL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Pancreatic Stone Clearance in Pancreatolithiasis Using Pretreatment CT Images and Clinical Features.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo consolidate the current evidence of artificial intelligence (AI) for management of nephrolithiasis using extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL), and to look at its feasibility into integration in clinical practice.
methodsIn March 2025, the sytematic search was conducted across several databases, including, PubMed, Google Scholar, ACM Digital Library, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore via Boolean operators with the use of the dedicated terms. Studies that described the development and validation and/or testing of AI-based models for ESWL, regardless of clinical scenario, published in English were included.
results17 studies met the inclusion criteria. These were grouped based on their primary application into two key scenarios: outcomes prediction (n = 14) and intraoperative assistance (n = 3). Despite promising results, many studies used meaningfully different methodologies to develop AI-based models, especially different baseline inputs. Moreover, many studies present mutually exclusive information, as illustrated by the use of body mass index (BMI) as input. Finally, many studies are presented as single center studies or without external testing, which reduces the likelihood of generalizability of the resulting accuracy metrics.
conclusionThere is increasing evidence of the role of AI in predicting ESWL outcomes and assisting during the procedure, often outperforming traditional statistical models. More prospective multi-institutional studies need to be done with standardized parameters and external validation to fully integrate AI in the management of ESWL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40643681What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.