Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40643681›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2025

Current state of AI for shockwave lithotripsy: a systematic review from YAU and EAU endourology.

Ali Talyshinskii, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Lazaros Tzelves, Nithesh Naik, Carlotta Nedbal, Nurbol Keulimzhayev, Frédéric Panthier, Amelia Pietropaolo, Bhaskar Kumar Somani

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ali TalyshinskiiDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan. urovator@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3521-8937
Patrick Juliebø-JonesYoung Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4253-1283
Lazaros TzelvesYoung Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4619-9783
Nithesh NaikDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0356-7697
Carlotta NedbalEuropean Association of Urology (EAU) Endourology Section, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2031-347X
Nurbol KeulimzhayevDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1143-1650
Frédéric PanthierEuropean Association of Urology (EAU) Endourology Section, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-2984
Amelia PietropaoloYoung Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7631-3108
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniEuropean Association of Urology (EAU) Endourology Section, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo consolidate the current evidence of artificial intelligence (AI) for management of nephrolithiasis using extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL), and to look at its feasibility into integration in clinical practice.

methodsIn March 2025, the sytematic search was conducted across several databases, including, PubMed, Google Scholar, ACM Digital Library, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore via Boolean operators with the use of the dedicated terms. Studies that described the development and validation and/or testing of AI-based models for ESWL, regardless of clinical scenario, published in English were included.

results17 studies met the inclusion criteria. These were grouped based on their primary application into two key scenarios: outcomes prediction (n = 14) and intraoperative assistance (n = 3). Despite promising results, many studies used meaningfully different methodologies to develop AI-based models, especially different baseline inputs. Moreover, many studies present mutually exclusive information, as illustrated by the use of body mass index (BMI) as input. Finally, many studies are presented as single center studies or without external testing, which reduces the likelihood of generalizability of the resulting accuracy metrics.

conclusionThere is increasing evidence of the role of AI in predicting ESWL outcomes and assisting during the procedure, often outperforming traditional statistical models. More prospective multi-institutional studies need to be done with standardized parameters and external validation to fully integrate AI in the management of ESWL.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceKidney CalculiLithotripsyNephrolithiasisHumansUrologyArtificial intelligenceAssistanceESWLNephrolithiasisOutcomes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.