Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40643676›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Effect of FRAXplus adjustments on fracture risk reclassification in older Swedish women-results from the SUPERB-study.

M Zoulakis, H Johansson, N C Harvey, K F Axelsson, H Litsne, L Johansson, M Schini, L Vandenput, E V McCloskey, J A Kanis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The phenotype of pelvic and acetabular fractures in adults aged 50 and older: a national database analysis in the Netherlands.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Adjusting fracture probability according to duration of diabetes: the Manitoba BMD Registry.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  8. Complementary effects of trabecular bone score and hip axis length on fracture risk: the Manitoba BMD Registry.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M ZoulakisSahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
H JohanssonSahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
N C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
K F AxelssonSahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
H LitsneSahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
L JohanssonSahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
M SchiniMellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine & Population Health, University of Sheffield, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
L VandenputSahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
E V McCloskeyMRC and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Sheffield, UK.
J A KanisCentre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Mattias LorentzonSahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. mattias.lorentzon@medic.gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0749-1431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FRAXplus® facilitates adjustment of FRAX® fracture probabilities for additional clinical risk factors. This study examined how FRAXplus adjustments affect the proportion of older Swedish women eligible for treatment at a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) probability intervention threshold (IT) ≥ 26%.

backgroundFRAXplus enables adjustments based on additional clinical information, such as recency of osteoporotic fractures, high-dose oral glucocorticoids, T2DM duration, lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), falls in the previous year, and hip axis length. We aimed to determine how these adjustments alter treatment eligibility in older Swedish women.

methodsTen-year fracture probabilities with femoral neck BMD were calculated using FRAX and adjusted by FRAXplus in the SUPERB cohort of 3028 Swedish women aged 75 to 80 years. Clinical risk factors (CRFs) and outcomes were collected via questionnaires and national registers over 8 years, with incident X-ray-verified MOFs. FRAXplus adjustments were applied one factor at a time; if multiple were available, the most influential factor was used. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) was calculated.

resultsOverall, 90% (n = 2723) had their 10-year MOF probability adjusted upwards, with a mean (± SD) change of 4.25% (5.12%). Common adjustments included HAL (31%), TBS (23%), falls (20%), LS BMD (8%), and recent fracture (5%). Similar patterns were observed for hip fracture probabilities. Among those below the IT using FRAX alone, 1785 remained below, with 365 (20.4%) experiencing incident MOFs. Of 339 women uplifted above the IT using FRAXplus, 119 (35.1%) sustained incident MOFs. Among 904 above the IT with both FRAX and FRAXplus, 324 (35.8%) experienced incident MOFs. The NRI was 4.82% (95% CI: 1.87-7.77%; p < 0.01).

conclusionsFRAXplus improved risk stratification, with a significant proportion of older Swedish women having their fracture probabilities uplifted above the IT, more accurately reflecting their elevated fracture risk, thereby enhancing the utility of risk assessment tools and improving patient management.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesAbsorptiometry, PhotonAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityFemaleFemur NeckHumansLumbar VertebraeOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSwedenFracture risk predictionFRAXplusHip fractureMajor osteoporotic fracture (MOF)OsteoporosisSwedish woman

Identifiers

PMID40643676
PMCPMC12460473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.