ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2025
Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of enasidenib in patients with hepatic impairment.
Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnasidenib, an isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 (IDH2) inhibitor, is indicated for adult patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an IDH2 mutation. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of enasidenib in subjects with hepatic impairment (HI).
methodsA multicenter, open-label study assessed the PK of a single 100 mg oral dose of enasidenib in subjects with mild (n = 8), moderate (n = 8), and severe (n = 8) HI (Child-Pugh classification) and matched healthy controls (n = 16). Plasma concentrations of enasidenib and its active metabolite, AGI-16,903, were analyzed, and PK parameters were compared between HI groups and healthy controls.
resultsFollowing a single oral dose, enasidenib exposure (AUC0-∞) was comparable across all groups, with geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of 97.7%, 96.7%, and 87.4% for mild, moderate, and severe HI versus healthy controls, respectively. Cmax values showed similar trends, with GMRs of 119%, 85.7%, and 86.4% for mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively. AGI-16,903 exposure decreased with increasing HI severity, with GMRs for AUC0-∞ of 86.3%, 65.0%, and 61.1% for mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively.
conclusionHI did not significantly alter PK of enasidenib. While AGI-16,903 exposure decreased with increasing HI severity, the impact was not deemed clinically relevant. Taken together, the results of this study support the conclusion that no dose adjustment is warranted for subjects with mild, moderate, or severe HI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40643669What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.