Trial reportDysphagia2026
Differential Muscle Activation During Sustained Chin-Tuck Against Resistance (CTAR) Contraction is Consistent Across Different Instructional Conditions in Older Adults.
Trial report in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between Chin-Tuck-Generated Force and Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The chin tuck against resistance (CTAR) is a popular exercise targeting suprahyoid muscles involved in swallowing. Its effectiveness presumably relies on proper execution. This study assessed the effect of different instructional strategies on neck muscle activation in older adults executing a sustained CTAR contraction. Ninety healthy individuals aged 65 to 90 years old were randomly assigned to one of three groups: video-only, video plus verbal instruction, or video with visual biofeedback using surface electromyography (sEMG). Surrogate measures of muscle recruitment and fatigue within both the suprahyoid and sternocleidomastoid muscles were compared across the three instructional groups. The sEMG amplitude measures were normalized with respect to maximal jaw opening and head rotation. Suprahyoid activity was significantly higher than sternocleidomastoid in terms of both normalized amplitude and fatigue. An analysis of variance failed to show significant differences in either sEMG measures as a function of instructional strategy, although the distribution of responses with biofeedback was significantly more clustered around the group mean (i.e. leptokurtic). The effects of sustained CTAR contractions on suprahyoid activity remain consistent across different instructional strategies, suggesting the technique is a robust one. Biofeedback does seem to improve groupwise performance predictability, however. Future studies should explore longitudinal effects to determine whether instructional strategy may affect outcomes over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40643620What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.