Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40643616›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia2026

Anesthesia research misconduct in Japan: understanding the status is critical to prevention.

Kazuyoshi Hirota, Junichi Saito, Yusuke Mazda, Kazuyoshi Aoyama, Koichi Suehiro, Fumimasa Amaya, Kiyoshi Morita, Junzo Takeda

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kazuyoshi HirotaWorking Group for Academic Promotion Project, Japan Federation of Anesthesiologists, Kobe, Japan. hirotak@hirosaki-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6936-0985
Junichi SaitoWorking Group for Academic Promotion Project, Japan Federation of Anesthesiologists, Kobe, Japan.
Yusuke MazdaWorking Group for Academic Promotion Project, Japan Federation of Anesthesiologists, Kobe, Japan.
Kazuyoshi AoyamaWorking Group for Academic Promotion Project, Japan Federation of Anesthesiologists, Kobe, Japan.
Koichi SuehiroWorking Group for Academic Promotion Project, Japan Federation of Anesthesiologists, Kobe, Japan.
Fumimasa AmayaWorking Group for Academic Promotion Project, Japan Federation of Anesthesiologists, Kobe, Japan.
Kiyoshi MoritaWorking Group for Academic Promotion Project, Japan Federation of Anesthesiologists, Kobe, Japan.
Junzo TakedaWorking Group for Academic Promotion Project, Japan Federation of Anesthesiologists, Kobe, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retraction Watch indicates that half of the worst 10 cases of research misconduct were by Japanese researchers. This is exemplified in an article entitled 'Tide of Lies' published in the Journal "Science". This article is a no holds barred view of some of the science in Japan and is an essential step on the road to prevention. However, as 3 Japanese anesthesiologists are listed in the worst 10, many Japanese academic societies point the finger at the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA). The society cannot ignore this. Prevention of research misconduct/fraud has therefore been considered. Whilst there are no measures that can completely prevent research misconduct, there are steps that can reduce its likelihood. At the researcher level, mandatory ethics training. At the department and laboratory level, central data management, regular research progress/debriefing meetings. At the academic society level, Research Misconduct Monitoring Committees should be set up to facilitate anonymous reporting. Regaining research reputation and passion in Japan is critical to moving our specialty forward. This must be done with renewed vigor for the prevention of research misconduct.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyBiomedical ResearchScientific MisconductHumansJapanFabricationFalsificationPlagiarismResearch misconduct

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.