ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
Immunomodulatory impacts of thermal and pulsed field ablation therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma associated with viral hepatitis.
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields (nsPEFs) for Precision Intracellular Oncotherapy: Recent Advances and Emerging Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ablation therapy for liver cancer has become one of the most important tools for the radical treatment of early-stage liver cancer and the palliative treatment of middle- and late-stage liver cancer. Ablation not only kills liver cancer cells directly, but also activates the antitumor immune response of the body. However, the activated antitumor immune response is not enough to inhibit the recurrence or stop the progression of liver cancer. Immunotherapy offers new hope in this context, but its efficacy is still unsatisfactory. Understanding the role and mechanism of different ablation therapies in activating antitumor immune responses is the basis for the development of ablation-specific immunotherapy protocols. In particular, pulsed field ablation, as a nonthermal ablation technique, can make up for the shortcomings of thermal ablation. However, as pulsed field ablation is still an emerging technology, the mechanism of activation of antitumor immune responses by ablation remains unclear. Therefore, comparing the similarities and differences between thermal ablation and pulsed field ablation in activating antitumor immunity can provide theoretical support for the development of immunotherapy after thermal ablation and pulsed field ablation for liver cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40643596What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.