ReviewMagyar onkologia2025
[Overall survival, organ preservation, function preservation: the role of surgery in the treatment of laryngeal cancer].
Review in Magyar onkologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognosis of early stage laryngeal carcinoma treated with radiation therapy or surgery (preferably transoral resection) is favorable. In these cases, the choice of the therapy is mainly driven by functional outcomes (speech, swallowing and respiratory function). However, there has not been any substantial improvement in the treatment of locoregionally advanced larynx cancer. The selection of the most ideal therapy is difficult, as upfront total laryngectomy is rather radical, and has a dramatic effect on quality of life, whereas reliable predictors of radiosensitivity are lacking. Moreover, current data undermines the oncologic effectiveness of salvage laryngectomy. In this review, we summarize the current anatomical and functional facts and concepts with respect to the previous clinical trials and studies that might influence the decision making during the treatment of a laryngeal cancer patient in 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40643449PMC12255503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.