ArticleJournal of animal science2025
Individual variability in metabolic and hormonal profiles for body reserve dynamics in ewes reared under indoor or outdoor farming system conditions.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanisms Underlying the Impact of Feed-to-Gain Ratio Differences on Nutrient Metabolism in Simmental and Simmental × Hereford Crossbred Cattle Fed a Low-Energy Diet.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability of ruminants to cope with energy imbalances through alternating body reserves (BR) mobilization and accretion is a key mechanism to improve animals' resilience and/or robustness. This study aimed to characterize individual variability in BR dynamics using plasma concentrations of key biomarkers in productive ewes. Non-esterified fatty acids, β-hydroxybutyrate, triiodothyronine, insulin, and body condition score traits were monitored longitudinally throughout the productive cycles. The study included primiparous and multiparous ewes, reared under 2 contrasting farming systems (FS), indoor (173 ewes) and outdoor (234 ewes), belonging to 2 cohorts (Coh17/18). We used functional principal component analysis and unsupervised clustering to capture biomarker variation. The optimal number of clusters was selected using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), integrated complete-data likelihood (ICL), normalized entropy criterion (NEC), and a minimum cluster size of >5% of ewes. The decrease in BR indicated that BR mobilization occurred from mid-pregnancy (P) until weaning (W), regardless of FS or parity (Par). On the contrary, the increase in BR suggested that BR accretion occurred from W until the next P in both FS. Between 2 and 3 distinct trajectories were identified for each biomarker (BIC < 3214.38; ICL < 3237.82; NEC < 6.450), depending on Par and/or FS. Most trajectories were characterized by transient increases in biomarker concentrations during the BR mobilization period, followed by declines that sometimes continued into the BR accretion phase. Such trajectories differed mainly in biomarker concentrations at different stages and/or the time point when peaks were observed. Greater individual variability in biomarker trajectories was particularly observed around lambing. Maintaining similar trajectories across cycles in major clusters for 53% to 100% of ewes suggested that biomarker trajectories might be repeatable. In addition to individual variability, BR levels, their temporal changes, and litter size contributed to the distribution of ewes across clusters for each of the traits, with low (P ≤ 0.05), moderate (P < 0.01), and high (P < 0.001) levels of significance. These findings highlight the potential of plasma biomarkers for characterizing individual variability in BR variations in ruminants reared in different FS conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.