Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40643347›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Between repulsion and attraction in serial biases: Replication of Chen and Bae (2024).

Juni B Akselberg, Sara B Cardona, Mikkel Dybvad, Lise Martine Karlstad, Malin Langemyr, Ingrid A Mellingsæter-Jokic, Mats K K Moe, Amalie C Solvang, Andrey Chetverikov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Juni B AkselbergFaculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Sara B CardonaFaculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Mikkel DybvadFaculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Lise Martine KarlstadFaculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Malin LangemyrFaculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ingrid A Mellingsæter-JokicFaculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Mats K K MoeFaculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Amalie C SolvangFaculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Andrey ChetverikovDepartment of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What you see depends on what you have seen before, and commonly your perception is drawn toward the past. Such attractive biases, known as serial dependence, are well established for many visual features. Interestingly, Chen and Bae (2024, Cognition) recently reported a repulsive serial bias in a pointing direction estimation task that switched to an attractive one in the presence of a distracting task. At the same time, an analysis of response trajectories revealed a repulsive bias during response execution, irrespective of the condition. These surprising findings prompted us to attempt a replication. We confirmed the main findings of Chen and Bae. However, we also demonstrated that the overall direction and magnitude of the bias are relatively stable for a given observer, regardless of the condition. Furthermore, we found that already the very first moment in the response trajectory differed between conditions, showing a predominantly attractive bias for trials that ended with attraction. The results confirm the robustness of the original findings and pose a challenge for a simple Bayesian model of serial dependence, highlighting the need for computational models that can explain both attractive and repulsive biases.

Indexed as

AttentionVisual PerceptionAdultBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40643347
PMCPMC12266288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.