ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2025
Update on North American tick-borne diseases and how to diagnose them.
Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment and application of a multiplex qPCR panel for multi-host surveillance of tick-Borne pathogens.Emerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- Comparative speed of kill of induced Ixodes scapularis infestations following treatment of dogs with endectocides containing either sarolaner (Simparica Trio™), afoxolaner (NexGardParasites & vectors · 2026Article
- A Study of Canine Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever Prevalence Seen in a South Carolina Veterinary Lameness and Performance Referral Center.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- The potential to improve Lyme disease diagnostics through quantification of immunoglobulin class switching patterns.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent decades have seen a rise in the incidence of tick-borne diseases in the US, along with an increased number of pathogens transmitted by ticks, and geographic expansion of tick populations. A variety of laboratory testing methodologies are available for the diagnosis of tick-borne diseases, including serology, microscopy, and molecular-based methods. The preferred approach varies by the specific disease, locally available test options, and the stage of illness at patient presentation. This mini-review focuses on updates in our understanding of the epidemiology of tick-borne diseases in the US and advances in the field of laboratory diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.