ReviewmSphere2025
Straining to define a healthy microbiome.
Review in mSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 15-strain live biotherapeutic product or same donor fecal microbiota transplant for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a randomized phase 1b trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Editorial: Fecal Microbiota Transplants: challenges in translating microbiome research to clinical applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In 2020, I wrote an mSphere of Influence commentary on two studies that shaped my research perspective on the human gut microbiome (McNulty et al., Sci Transl Med 3:106ra106, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002701; Hamilton et al., Gut Microbes 4:125, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.23571). The microbiome field has continued to progress since the publication of these studies over 10 years ago, emerging as a considerable factor in almost all areas focused on disease development. My previous commentary highlighted two areas that piqued my interest early on in my career: (i) that the extant microbial community should be considered when proposing to manipulate the microbiota, such as via probiotics or fecal microbiota transplantation, and (ii) that realized (i.e., transcribed) functional changes of the microbiota may occur independent of changes in its composition. Since writing that commentary, two microbiota-based therapeutics for the treatment of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.