ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025
Shifts in bee diet breadths are associated with gene gains and losses and positive selection across olfactory receptors.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bees are palynivorous insects that vary widely in the number of plant families from which they collect pollen. Their evolutionary history has been marked by multiple transitions in diet breadth between specialists that only visit specific plant genera (narrow diet breadth) and generalists that visit multiple large plant families (broad diet breadth). Understanding the evolution of sensory systems associated with changes in the detection, discrimination, and gustation of different pollen in bees can shed light on the underlying genetic mechanisms associated with transitions between narrow and broad diet breadths. We conducted a comparative study of three families of insect olfactory receptor genes (odorant receptors (ORs), gustatory receptors (GRs), and ionotropic receptors (IRs)) linked to diet breadth across 51 bee species. We calculated rates of gene gains and losses and identified genes experiencing positive selection across specialist and generalist bees. Our results show that broad generalists exhibit high rates of OR gene losses and GR gene gains. We observed accelerated rates of evolution in seven orthologous groups of genes across specialists and one group in generalists. Several orthogroups showed diversification in putative ligand-binding domains of proteins, indicating potential shifts in functional properties of the receptors. Taken together, these results indicate that dietary specialization in bees requires chemosensory system diversification of existing genes while dietary generalization is associated with the loss of ORs and gain of GRs. Our study provides important insights into the genetic architecture underlying shifts in niche occupancy across insects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.