Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642978›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2025

Chronic fatigue: psychometric properties and updated norm values of the Chalder fatigue scale in a cross-sectional sample representative of the German population.

Lina Krakau, Felix Wicke, Winfried Häuser, Manfred E Beutel, Elmar Brähler, Nora Hettich-Damm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lina KrakauDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7727-9773
Felix WickeDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9244-114X
Winfried HäuserDepartment Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University Munich, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3742-729X
Manfred E BeutelDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1743-0042
Elmar BrählerDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2648-2728
Nora Hettich-DammDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0422-7037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ) is a commonly used self-report instrument assessing the severity and chronicity of fatigue. We examine the psychometric properties of the CFQ and provide updated normative data for the German general population. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe CFQ was administered to

resultsIndicators of internal consistency reliability were high for the CFQ total and subscales (

conclusionThe CFQ is a brief and reliable instrument for assessing fatigue in general population settings. The results are limited by the lack of comparison with other established fatigue questionnaires.

Indexed as

FatigueFatigue Syndrome, ChronicAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsChalder Fatigue ScaleChronic fatiguefatiguemeasurementsomatic symptoms

Identifiers

PMID40642978
PMCPMC12258208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.