ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Microenvironment Engineering Enables Broad Strategies for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sulfur-Fluoride Exchangeable Moiety-Integrated Mediator of Benzenesulfonyl Fluoride Additives in Low-Electrolyte Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.ChemSusChem · 2026Article
- Porous Organic Frameworks for Lithium-Metal Anodes: Design Strategies, Mechanisms, and Future Perspectives.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Practical Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: An Integrated Design Roadmap from High-Loading Cathodes to High-Energy Pouch Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Microenvironment Engineering Enables Broad Strategies for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) are regarded as one of the most promising next-generation energy storage technologies due to their high energy density, abundant resource availability, and environmental sustainability. However, significant challenges, such as the lithium polysulfides shuttle effect and sluggish redox kinetics, impede their practical application. Microenvironment engineering provides innovative solutions to these issues by precisely controlling the physical and chemical environments of key components within LSBs. Despite the significance of this approach, there is a lack of systematic reviews on its application in the field of LSBs. This review fills the gap by comprehensively summarizing the research progress in microenvironment engineering for LSBs, focusing on four key aspects: 1) structural microenvironment engineering; 2) lithiophilicity microenvironment engineering; 3) sulfiphilicity microenvironment engineering; and 4) lithiophilicity-sulfiphilicity microenvironment engineering. These strategies are analyzed for their role in mitigating the challenges associated with LSBs. Finally, the research directions and the ongoing potential of the microenvironment engineering to drive further progress in this field are proposed for inspiring innovation and accelerating the practical application of LSBs in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.