Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642766›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Regression models for the prediction of the influence of magnesium ions on primary endothelial cell (HUVEC) proliferation and migration.

Heike Helmholz, Redon Resuli, Marius Tacke, Jalil Nourisa, Sven Tomforde, Roland Aydin, Regine Willumeit-Römer, Berit Zeller-Plumhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heike HelmholzInstitute of Metallic Biomaterials, Helmholz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany.
Redon ResuliInstitute of Metallic Biomaterials, Helmholz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany.
Marius TackeInstitute of Material Systems Modeling, Helmholz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany.
Jalil NourisaInstitute of Material Systems Modeling, Helmholz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany.
Sven TomfordeDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Roland AydinInstitute of Material Systems Modeling, Helmholz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany.
Regine Willumeit-RömerInstitute of Metallic Biomaterials, Helmholz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany.
Berit Zeller-PlumhoffInstitute of Metallic Biomaterials, Helmholz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis is one of the first stages in fracture healing and bone repair. Therefore, numerous studies evaluating the effect of Mg as a promising degradable, metallic biomaterial on the proliferation and function of endothelial cells have been performed. However, these studies lack methodological homogeneity and therefore differ in fundamental conclusions. Here, Mg-concentration-, donor- and cell age- dependent relations to primary human umbilical cord vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) proliferation and migration were investigated systematically. The generated data were utilized to develop regression models in order to assess and predict the cell response on Mg exposition in a concentration range of 2-20 mM Mg in cell culture medium extract. A concentration of > 2 mM already induced a detrimental effect in the sensitive primary HUVECs. Molecular data quantifying angiogenesis markers supported this finding. An increased migration capacity has been observed at a concentration of 10 mM Mg. We compared linear regression, random forests, support vector machines, neural networks and large language models for the prediction of HUVEC proliferation for a number of scenarios. Using these machine learning methods, we were able to predict the proliferation of HUVECs for missing Mg concentrations and for missing passages with mean absolute errors below 10 % and as low as 8.5 %, respectively. Due to strong differences between the cell behaviour of different donors, information for missing donors can be predicted with mean absolute errors of 15.7 % only. Support vector machines with linear kernel performed best on the tested data, but large language models also showed promising results.

Indexed as

Cell proliferationHUVECLarge Language ModelRegression models

Identifiers

PMID40642766
PMCPMC12241815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.