ArticleCureus2025
Is Endoscopic Approach Alone Adequate for the Management of Ureterovaginal Fistulas?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost ureterovaginal fistulas (UVFs) are caused by gynecologic, urologic, or colorectal surgeries. Urine leaks, renal failure, and infections lower patients' quality of life. Minimally invasive endoscopic double-J (DJ) stenting has become popular. There is insufficient research on the effects of DJ stenting on fistula size, diagnostic timeliness, and patient comorbidities. OBJECTIVE AND
methodsThis study examines the efficacy of endoscopic DJ stent implantation in treating UVFs and addresses aspects such as fistula size, diagnosis timing, and comorbidities. This is a five-year retrospective study (2019 to 2024) conducted in Bhopal, India, comprising 31 patients with UVF who received endoscopic DJ stenting as the main treatment. Analyses included patient demographics, clinical presentation, fistula features, treatment outcomes, and complications. Statistical analysis includes chi-square tests for categorical variables and logistic regression for risk factor assessment, with a p-value < 0.05 considered significant.
resultsDJ stenting showed a success rate of 77.4% (24/31 cases), with higher rates for early diagnosis (<4 weeks) and small fistula size (<5 mm) (p=0.038 and 0.032, respectively). Late diagnosis (>4 weeks), large fistula size (>5 mm), diabetes, and elevated creatinine (>1.2 mg/dL) were independent predictors of treatment failure in multivariate analysis. Minor issues included dysuria (16.1%, n=5) and hematuria (9.7%, n=3). One patient (3.2%) needed surgery due to a forgotten DJ stent.
conclusionIf the UVF is minor and detected early, endoscopic DJ stenting can work. Renal failure, diabetes, larger fistulas, and delayed diagnosis reduce treatment success. Early prognostic identification and patient selection are crucial to maximize results and minimize surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.